Best Lab Equipment

Here are some more information for Microscope Stand Light:

An Insight Into the Big Bang and Dark Matter

Author M.P.King BSc. (Hons)

The Generally accepted cosmological Theories

It has been theorised by many scientists that the big bang occurred approximately 12,000 million years ago and that the cosmos up until that point did not exist. Now I find it very difficult to accept that an event such as the big bang - with such vast amounts of energy as to be way beyond our comprehension -, suddenly appeared out of nowhere and continued on to form the known cosmos of today. It is also stated by scientists that there is insufficient matter in today’s cosmos to tie up with calculated quantities, the amount of which would decide one way or another whether the distant future cosmos will firstly, continue to expand, secondly, will remain at a final maximum with no further expansion or lastly reach a maximum and then revert to a contracting state. The first oddity comes from the repaired Hubble telescope which now has a magnification factor easily able to see clearly the outer fringe of the expanding big bang. There is no outer fringe to the cosmos at 12,000 million light years distance. Clearly something is amiss with either theory or calculations. I am also thinking that a 12,000 million light year fringe would necessitate an expansion for 12,000 million light years and then the return of the light emitted at that fringe which would then take another 12,000 million light years to reach us, a total of 24 million light years this means that after 12,000 million light years we would only be seeing the fringe of 6,000 million light years, The Hubble equation uses a constant to enable the expected results to be generated but if a constant is required then the theory is suspect, but perhaps we shouldn’t go there. The second anomaly is the theory expounded to allow for the missing matter. The missing matter according to today’s scientists is made up of dark matter which we can’t see and the effects of which cannot be measured, convenient if nothing else. The third anomaly is involved with galaxies, each of which is said to be falling into a central black hole. Would it not be more conceivable for each galaxy to be the result of an individual big bang or to coin a phrase a white hole? Certainly the spiral effect of the individual galaxies would then be due to matter falling into the very large black holes in the dim distant future especially if the approach of the matter to the black hole was at an angle to the axis. It has also been recently stated that the cosmos is expanding but at a rate which is accelerating.

For cosmological accelerating expansion to occur, vast quantities of energy beyond imagination would be required, all at once – another theoretical joke. The last theory which I must admit is quite plausible is that over a sufficiently long period of time the cosmos will grow old, the suns will burn out and all matter will decay and turn eventually back to dust with no light at all. That is if cosmological time works in the accepted way.

I personally do not feel that this is to be the way of things to come. Others may disagree with me but until I see proof to back up any other ‘way out’ theories I will continue to choose to understand the cosmological functioning as follows:

The big bang did happen, but so did many others spread throughout the cosmos at differing times and places, untold millions of them. This would account for the missing expansion fringe at 12,000 million light years distance, as the mix of many expansions would be seen as a continuing cosmos. The expansion rate of these universes occurring at differing times and places and in differing directions would, from a sufficient distance, appear to be accelerating with reference to our own position, with particular emphasis to the possibility of the position of the observer being on the opposite side of his own expanding universe.

In the dim distant future taking the scenario that there is sufficient matter in the universe to cause an eventual contraction, the gradual contracting matter would eventually form black holes by the millions spread through time and space past, present and future. Again the holes would form at entirely random times and places and the numbers would be beyond count. As each of these black holes attracts more and more matter into their hearts so the gravity wells would increase proportionately. The energy within the gravity well would, given sufficient time, increase to the point where matter entering, would be accelerated up to and beyond the speed of light.

Yes I know that it is supposed to be impossible for matter to exceed the speed of light but we have unusual and extreme circumstances here. In the first place, matter is transformed by the extreme heat and pressure within the gravity well to a form of proton/neutron plasma. This is due to the extremes of pressure, gravity and temperature affecting matter entering black holes. It is this plasma which is accelerated by the gravitational well energy to speeds in excess of that of the speed of light. Secondly, the laws of physics inside a black hole are unknown, as no one has even seen one. Now because the plasma has exceeded light velocity its only course is to go back in time. If the energy level is sufficient then the time span may well be such to allow energy plasma to erupt into space as a big bang many millions of millions of years back in time, as ours did 12,000 million years ago. I would imagine that once the fabric of space had been ruptured then the energy required to keep it that way would be much less, enaballing the eruption of matter from the exit point to continue for some time befor the energy available reduced to a point where the emerging matter would cease. This may or may not cause the dissipation of the black hole in the future due to insufficient energy to maintain it. Ours may have been the first but equally it may have been the last. This would then imply that the cosmos may have been in existence and expanding for much, much longer that the estimated 12,000 million years. It could of course be in the order of millions of times the above estimated value. As the black holes are forming in the future at differing times and places, so the emerging big bangs would also emerge at differing times and places in the dim distant past.

A recent Horizon program (UK.TV.) tried to use the string theory to show that time travel was possible. This theory was put forth in a way, which appeared to be proven, or that such proof was taken for granted. There is no proof what so ever to back up this type of fairy tale. No strings have ever been detected and there doesn’t seem much chance that they ever will. Mathematical proof without factual evidence is only useful as a guide to scientists that a theory may be possible in actuality but should not be taken as a forgone conclusion that any particular theory is valid.

Too many unfounded theories are presented by TV science programs, as if they are true tried and tested theories. This theory of mine which I admit is just as unfounded does have in its defence a large element of possibility. Getting back to the subject….

…The original problem of missing matter in the universe is cleared up instantly as a large proportion of the missing matter has been sent back in time to form the past big bangs. A virtual doughnut in time.

Taking things a little further, if we allow that time is a human perception thing and doesn’t really exist except within our minds then we have the large amounts of matter moving through space, not time, as this is only a human sensibility. This is a bit loose but ties in with some theories regarding the essence of time and the human awareness of time in general. The last point which helps this line of thought is the fact that when any matter is moving there are time differentials (to our senses and measurements) occurring. (Einstein’s Theory of relativity). The greater the velocity then the greater the time differential. NASA has proven this during the flights to the moon and back using atomic clocks. Even within our own bodies these time differentials occur, when we walk, move any part of our bodies and even talking, time is different for each part relative to any other which is still or moving at a different velocity. It may only be microscopic fractions of a microsecond but they are there. If one goes along with the notion that time doesn’t exist then there is no problem of differential time effects on any moving parts. This next part is a bit more to try to swallow and it relates to the measurement of vast distances using the red spectral shift. The amount of spectral shift is supposed to relate directly to the distance in light years. Now if we look at the packets of light quanta emitted from source, call them photons of you like. When emitted primarily they will conform to the required red shift as purporting to distance but when the photons pass large gravitational bodies then they will be accelerated as they approach and decelerated as they draw away. The effect of this is that when accelerated the energy level of the energy quanta increases and to accommodate this increase of energy so the relative speed will increase, as the speed of light is a constant, so time related to the packet of energy will speed up to conserve the SOL and the converse will be true for the photons in a decelerating state. At the same time the slingshot effect of gravitational energy from star and planetary material will also add to the relative energy level of the photons as will the absorption of energy by dust and cosmic radiation. It now gets worse because when the photons are subjected to large gravity fields such as stars and black holes and the like, they not only alter their energy status but also their directional status, during their multi-million light year sojourn they are subjected to many large gravitational energy sources and each source depending on its magnitude will alter the direction of travel of the photons.

After such a journey the photons could indicate a direction of emission from the totally opposite direction or even have circled around the cosmos a number of times before finalising upon an electronic receptor on this earth, we don’t really stand much chance of finding out exactly the photons origin, do we!

It is for these reasons that the use of the red shift phenomena to measure distance is erroneous. If for a moment we accept that time is a man perception thing only and as such does not really exist and then look at all these effects in detail we see a solution for the lost matter emerge and also for the expansion and contraction of the many big bangs, by removing time from the equation we simplify matters to a point where things start to make sense. Last but not least is the cosmic residual radiation which is theorised to be the remains of the big bang but the evenness of this radiation belies the expected discordant levels. Now if we look at this again but with the contents of this paper in mind then we have billions of big bangs all throughout time and space, past and present. This would have the effect of levelling the radiation to the state which we observe today.

Now my notes as laid out above may be disputed by many or even all but there are many questions raised which cannot be easily answered without rethinking a lot of the current theories, which may then prove to be erroneous. But if my over extreme thinking makes you stop and look carefully at all these accepted theories and their validity even postulate your own theories then it has achieved its result. An awful lot of currently accepted beliefs and or theories when looked at logically become a lot more unbelievable than this paper. The big bang, matter from nowhere? Dark matter, that we can’t see or measure? Light travelling in a straight line for in excess of 3000 million light years when it is known to be diverged by large gravitational fields? Doesn’t this conglomeration of normally accepted fictional theories make you stop and think, if it doesn’t well it should.

CONCLUSION

We have had our big bang; so therefore, looking at cause and effect, the cosmos will eventually contract. The Cosmos contracting causes black holes in the future leading to the big bang in the past, which means there is sufficient matter in the cosmos for contraction to eventually occur otherwise it would not have contracted in the first place which in turn means no big bang, no galaxies and no big bang theories of any kind.

The matter from the past big bang, must have been time shifted from the future, where else could it have originated. That is if there is such a thing as time. The missing matter is nicely accounted for by existing in a differing time phase. Within the cosmos as a whole, the amount of matter present throughout time is as calculated and is sufficient to cause eventual contraction. Remove time from the equation and it all fits together nicely. The use of the spectral red shift as a means of measuring distance is erroneous and accounts for all the strange and anomalous distance calculations. Multiple big bangs nicely accounts for the even cosmic radiation. And last but not least, where we see stars may not be where they actually are. Is it any wonder the theoretical cosmos is so misinterpreted?

About the Author

10 POINTS to whoever can answer these biology questions?

they deal with microscopes

1. Contrast is the ability of a specimen to stand out against its background.

2. If it is not thin, the light of the microscope will not be able to pass through it, making it impossible to see in the microscope lens.

Shackling is ridiculous and inhumane
Pamela White’s article “Pregnant in Prison” moved me to tears (cover story, Feb. 18). Having a wrist or ankle of a woman in labor shackled is shocking and inhumane. Only people who have never given birth would think such a thing is OK.

Thanks for visiting!